AbstractThe objective of the research was to study the peculiarities of the combination of zirconia and ceramic occlusal surfaces when constructing aesthetic fixed prosthetic appliances.Materials and methods. The study included 70 patients with zirconia and ceramic occlusal surfaces of aesthetic fixed dental prostheses. Group I included 24 patients with a combination of zirconia and ceramic occlusal surfaces. Group II included 30 patients with a combination of ceramic occlusal surfaces. Group III included 16 patients with a combination of zirconia occlusal surfaces. All the patients were observed 12 and 24 months after prosthetic repair.Results. 12 and 24 months after prosthetic repair, the occlusal contact surface area was the largest in Group II (8.18±0.16 mm2 and 9.17±0.1 mm2, respectively). In Group I, where only one occlusive surface was made of zirconium dioxide, significantly reduced levels of abrasion were observed as compared to Group II – 8.07±0.21 mm2 and 8.65±0.23 mm2, respectively. 36 months after denture wearing, in Group III, the smallest contact surface area – 7.84±0.15 mm2as well as the lowest growth of the surface area was observed – 8.07±0.13 mm2.Conclusions. Dental prostheses with at least one ceramic occlusal surface exhibit a strong tendency to abrasion and, consequently, to an increase in the occlusal surface area resulting in an excessive load on prosthetic appliance. Moreover, functional and aesthetic values of prosthetic prosthesis sharply decrease. Therefore, we recommend to produce zirconia occlusal surface or at least to combine the same materials, as it will increase the longevity of prosthetic appliance.
Zholudev DS. Ceramic materials in prosthetic dentistry. Ceramic based on aluminum oxide. Problemy stomatologii. 2012;5:8-15.
Bida BI. Pryntsypy ortopedychnoho likuvannia patolohii zuboshchelepnoii systemy pry znyzhenni vysoty prykusu, yoho prohnozuvannia ta profilaktyka: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia d-ra med. nauk: spets. 14.01.22. "Stomatolohiia". Kyiv. 2003, 31p.
Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103(2):80-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60010-8
Mitin NE, Nabatchikova LP, Vasilyeva TA. The analysis of contemporary methods of occlusion estimation and registration on the stage of orthopedic dentistry treatment. Ros. mediko-biol. vestn. im. akad. IP Pavlova. 2015;3:134-139.
Yang X, Sun YF, Tian L, et al. Precision of digital impressions with TRIOS under simulated intraoral impression taking conditions. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015;47(1):85-89. [PMid:25686335]
Bragareva NV. Metody kontrolya pri vosstanovlenii okklyuzii na ortopedicheskom prieme. Problemy stomatologii. 2013;5:45-49.
Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, N. Potiket N, et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide–based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: A prospective clinical pilot study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006;96(4):237-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 [PMid:17052467]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.