Changes in Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Tertiary Peritonitis
PDF

Keywords

abdominal sepsis
secondary peritonitis
tertiary peritonitis
humoral immunity
cellular immunity

Abstract

The objective of the research was to give a comparative characteristic of parameters of humoral and cellular immunity in the development of secondary and tertiary peritonitis.Materials and methods. The research enrolled 109 patients with secondary peritonitis, 20 of whom developed tertiary peritonitis. Changes in humoral and cellular immunity were evaluated by serial blood tests for the determination of leukocyte count, the relative number of lymphocytes, Ig A, M, and G levels, as well as by counting the phagocytic index, the phagocytic number and the leukocyte intoxication index. The statistical processing of the obtained data was made using the STATISTICA 5.0 software (StatSoft, USA).Results. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: the group of patients with secondary peritonitis (n=89) and the group of patients with tertiary peritonitis (n=20). In the development of tertiary peritonitis, leukocytosis, relative lymphocytopenia and high values of the leukocyte intoxication index persisted during the entire observation period. In tertiary peritonitis, the phagocytic index was significantly lower only on the day of hospitalization. In the group of tertiary peritonitis, the phagocytic number decreased significantly until the 7th day after surgery. Ig A, M and G levels were lower since admission and subsequently decreased as compared to the results in the group of patients with secondary peritonitis.Conclusions. 1. Tertiary peritonitis is the most severe form of abdominal sepsis with high rates of mortality and rather difficult early diagnosis. 2. With the development of tertiary peritonitis, leukocytosis increases and relative lymphocytopenia develops. 3. The reduction in phagocytic index is indicative for the prognosis of tertiary peritonitis. 4. Ig A and M levels are significantly lower, and the leukocyte intoxication index is high at the time of hospitalization in patients who subsequently develop tertiary peritonitis.
https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2017.4.11
PDF

References

Kozlov VK. Sepsis, tyazhelyy sepsis, septicheskiy shok kak smyslovye i klinicheskie kategoriyi (obshchaya metodologiya diagnostiki). Klinichna imunologiya. Alergologiya. Infektologiya. 2008; 2 (13): 39-50.

Malangoni MA. Evaluation and management of tertiary peritonitis. Am. Surg. 2000; 66 (2): 157-161.

Kryvoruchko IA, Boiko VV, Syvozhelizov AV. Rozpovsiudzhenyi hniinyi perytonit. GGalic’kij likars’kij visnik. 2012; 19 (3): 71-73.

De Sol A, Bisagni P, Ribaldi S et al. Septic complications after emergency surgical procedures consensus of Italian society on trauma and emergency surgery. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iaşi. 2017; 121 (1): 136-142.

Deikalo IM, Makhnitskyi AV, Sokolyk MB. Imunokorektsiia v kompleksnomu likuvanni khvorykh na hostryi abdominalnyi sepsys. Shpytalna khirurhiia. 2010; 4: 27-30.

Makarov AI, Vorobyeva NA, Dobrodeeva LK et al. Laboratornyye kriteriyi sistemnoy vospalitelnoy reaktsiyi pri abdominalnykh khirurgicheskikh infektsiyakh. Khirurgiya. 2009; 40 (5): 40-45.

Savchenko AA, Gvozdev II, Borisov AG et al. Osobennosti fagotsitarnoy aktivnosti i sostoyaniya respiratornogo vzryva neytrofilov krovi u bolnykh rasprostranennym gnoynym peritonitom v dinamike posleoperatsionnogo perioda. Infektsiya i immunitet. 2017; 7 (1): 51-60.

Riche F, Gayat E, Collet C et al. Local and systemic innate immune response to secondary human peritonitis. Critical Care. 2013; 17: 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12895

Gain YuM, Leonovich SI, Zavada NV et al. Immunnyy status pri peritonite i puti yego patogeneticheskoy korrektsiyi: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. Minsk: OOO "Yunipress"; c2001. 249p.

Rychagov GP, Barsukov KN. Khirurgiya tretichnogo peritonita. V kn. XI syezd khirurgov Rossiyskoy Federatsiyi; 25-27 maya 2011; Volgograd; 551.

Chromik AM, Meiser A, Hölling J et al. Identification of patients at risk for development of tertiary peritonitis on a surgical intensive care unit. Jour. of Gastrointest. Surg. 2009; 13 (7): 1358-1367.

Kamyshnikov VS. Spravochnik po kliniko-biokhimicheskim issledovaniyam i laboratornoy diagnostike. Minsk: MEDpress-inform; c2004. 920p.

Ostrovskiy VK, Alimov RR, Mishchenko AV et al. Nekotoryye dannyye o pokazatelyakh normy leykotsitarnogo indeksa intoksikatsiyi. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika. 2003; 1: 45-46.

Mayanskiy AN. Aktualnyye problemy fagotsitoza. Modelirovaniye i klinicheskaya kharakteristika fagotsitarnykh reaktsiy. Gorkiy. 1989; 5-15.

Yefimova IS. Sistemnaya vospalitelnaya reaktsiya u bolnykh s vtorichnym i tretichnym peritonitom. Khirurgicheskiye infektsiyi. 2007; 1: 27-31.

Beloborodova NV, Dmitrieva IB, Chernevskaya YeA. Sepsis-indutsirovannyy immunoparalich: patogenez, diagnostika i vozmozhnyye puti korrektsiyi. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. 2008; 6: 42-48.

Bezmozgin BG, Babkov OV, Surov DA et al. Dinamika urovnya endogennoy intoksikatsiyi u bolnykh kolorektalnym rakom, oslozhnennym peritonitom. Onkologiya. 2013; 14: 1100-1108.

Vasyliuk MD, Kavyn VO. Endotoksykoz u khvorykh z perytonitom i prohnozuvannia yoho perebihu. Galic’kij likars’kij visnik. 2004; 11 (4): 104-107.

Briskin BS, Hachatryan NN, Peters GE et al. Immunokorrektsiia starshikh vozrastnykh grupp s raspostranennymi formami peritonita. Khirurgiya. 2008; 10: 19-26.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.