ASPECTS OF THE UPPER URINARY TRACT DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE OBSTRUCTIVE PYELONEPHRITIS
PDF

Keywords

acute obstructive pyelonephritis
nephrostomy
stenting

Abstract

In Ukraine, acute pyelonephritis is considered to be a widespread urologic inflammatory pathology with a tendency to increase in morbidity rate requiring active treatment policy. Acute obstructive pyelonephritis arises if there is any existing obstruction of the upper urinary tract. Minimally invasive technique directed at eliminating obstruction has to be included to treatment measures. Currently, there are two methods of urgent restoration of normal urinary flow: percutaneous nephrostomy (PNS) and ureteral stenting.The objective of this research was to compare the efficacy and safety of both techniques in the treatment of patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis.Having analyzed 373 patients’ case histories, it has been established that technical success of PNS and stenting constituted 98.9% and 92.6%, respectively (p <0.05). The duration of drainage of the urinary tract was 7 ± 1 days in PNS group and 14 ± 1 days in stenting group. General incidence of complications associated with PNS was 15.5%, while incidence of complications associated with ureteral stenting was 28.6% (p <0.05).It has been concluded that percutaneous nephrostomy can be considered as an effective method of drainage of the upper urinary tract in patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis providing higher technical success (98.9% vs. 92.6%, p <0.05), lower incidence of complications (15.5 % vs. 28.6%, p <0.05) and better quality of life compared to ureteral stenting.
PDF

References

Vozianov O. F., Pasyechnikov S.P., Saydakova N.O. Optimization of medical aid for patients with acute pyelonephritis. Urolohiia. 1998; 4: 4-8.

Pavlova L. P., Saydakova N.O., Startseva L.M. Key indicators of providing urologic care in Ukraine for the year. Kyiv. 2002.

Pasyechnikov S. P., Mitchenko M.V. The use of leflocin in treatment of acute pyelonephritis. Mystetstvo likuvannia. 2005; 4(20): 104-107.

Pasyechnikov S. P., Mitchenko M.V Acute pyelonephritis. Zhurnal praktychnoho likaria. 2005; 3: 33-38.

Pasyechnikov S.P., Saydakova N.O., Hlyebov A.S. The current state of the problem concerning urinary and kidney infections in Ukraine. Materialy ziizdu Asotsiatsii urolohiv Ukraiiny. 09.16-18.2010; 72-74.

Pasyechnikov S.P., Synyshyn Yu.I. The use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treatment of patients with ureteral calculi complicated by acute pyelonephritis. Urolohiia: materialy konf: “Novitni tekhnolohii v urolohii ta androlohii”. 09.19-20.2010; 17(2): 95-96.

Rudenko A.V., Pasechnykov S.P., Mytchenko N.V. New data on the etiological factors of acute pyelonephritis. Mikrobiolohichnyi zhurnal. 1997; 59(5): 34-41.

Shulyak O. V., Vozianov S.O., Banyra O.B. Urology: manual. L. 2012; 492.

R. Damiano, A. Oliva, C. Esposito et al. Early and late complications of double pigtail Ureteral Stent. Urol. Int. 2002; 69: 136-140.

R.B. Dyer, M.Y.Chen, R.J. Zagoria et al. Complications of Ureteral Stent Placement. RadioGraphics. 2002; 22(5): 1005-1022.

Z.G. Goldsmith, O. Oredein-McCoy, L. Gerber, et al. Emergent ureteric stent vs percutaneous nephrostomy for obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis: patterns of use and outcomes from a 15-year experience. BJU Int. 2013; 112(2): 122-128.

J.H. Jeon, K.Kim, W.D. Han et al. Empirical Use of Ciprofloxacin for Acute Uncomplicated Pyelonephritis Caused by Escherichia coli in Communities Where the Prevalence of Fluoroquinolone Resistance Is High. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Jun. 2012; 56(6): 3043-3046.

K.A. Hausegger, H.R. Portugaller Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indicationscomplications. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 2016-2030.

W.J. Lee, U. Patel, S. Patel, G.P. Pillari Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 1994; 5: 135-139.

R.D. Mahmood, L. Yizhi, M.L Tan. Percutaneous Nephrostomy, in: Chronic Kidney Disease, Prof. Monika Göőz (Ed.). InTech. 2012; 297-314.

N.A. Memon, A.A. Talpur, J.M. Memon Indications and complications of indwelling ureteral stenting at NMCH, NAWABSHAH. Pakistan Journal of Surgery. 2007; 23(3): 187-191.

H. Nawaz, M. Hussain, A. Hashmi et al. Experience with indwelling JJ Stents. J Pac Med Assoc. 1993; 43(8): 147-149.

Regalado S.P. Emergency Percutaneous Nephrostomy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006; 23(3): 287-294.

Saltzman B. Ureteral Stents: Indications, variations and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 1988; 15: 481-491.

Singh I. Indwelling JJ ureteral stents-A current perspective and review of literature. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2003; 65(5): 405-412.

A.M. Syed, M. Khalid, M.F. Syed et al. Frequency of complications in image guided percutaneous nephrostomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013; 63(7): 816-820.

J.E. Ware Jr, C.D. Sherbourne. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6): 473-483.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.