Profile of Digital Mammography Findings in Patients with Histopathologically Proven Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
PDF

Keywords

ductal carcinoma in situ
mammogram
mass
microcalcification

Abstract

Breast carcinoma is a heterogeneous group of tumors with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, lesion characterization and diagnostic evaluation. Ductal carcinoma in situ accounts for 15%-20% of breast carcinomas detected in screened populations. Ductal carcinoma in situ has a variable appearance on mammography. The use of mammography has become as a very helpful tool for the early detection of larger number of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and, thus, offering timely surgery and the need for the appropriate radiation treatment to patients. This study was undertaken as a hospital-based retrospective study to evaluate the varied spectrum of mammographic findings in 57 women with histopathological diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. The spectrum of mammographic findings of ductal carcinoma in situ was found to vary widely. A thorough and vigilant inspection of a mammogram is necessary for all the patients to avoid the possibility of missing early diagnosis of this entity, since the findings are very subtle. Most cases show microcalcifications on mammograms and their early detection can help in early diagnosis, thereby offering conservative surgical approach to a patient. Microcalcifications can be present isolated or in association with a mass. These are mostly clustered in distribution followed by regional, segmental and ductal pattern of distribution. The morphology of microcalcifications is mostly amorphous, followed by pleiomorphic and fine heterogenous types. Hence, the mammogram must be interpreted with strict vigilance and proper attention to all aspects for early and correct diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ to help in proper guidance of its treatment.

https://doi.org/10.21802/gmj.2020.1.7
PDF

References

Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Postma EL et al. Invasive ductolobular carcinoma of the breast: spectrum of mammographic, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings correlated with proportion of the lobular component. Springerplus. 2013;2:621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-621 [PMid:24340243 PMCid:PMC3858590]

Schmitt J, Silen W, Sadowsky NL et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:898-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198804073181406 [PMid:2832757]

Haagenser CD. Diseases of the breast. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; c1971. 586p.

Tabar L, Akerhend E, Cad A. Five-year experience with single-view mammography randomized controlled screening in Sweden. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1984;90:105-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82031-1_14 [PMid:6366948]

Andersson I. Breast cancer screening in Malmo. Recent Results Cancer Res 1984;90:114-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82031-1_15 [PMid:6366950]

Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B et at. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol 6). I. Intraductal carcinoma (DCIS). Cancer. 1986;57:197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<197::AID-CNCR2820570203>3.0.CO;2-N

Ashikari R, Hajdu SI, Robbins CF. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast. (1960-1969). Cancer. 1971;28:1182-1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1971)28:5<1182::AID-CNCR2820280515>3.0.CO;2-H

Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1982;32:194-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.32.4.194 [PMid:6805867]

Brown PW, Silverman J, Owens E et al. Intraductal "noninfiltrating" carcinoma of the breast. Arch Surg. 1976;111(10):1063-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1976.01360280021003 [PMid:184756]

Lagios MD, Westdahl PR, Rose MR. The concept and implications of mutticentricity in breast carcinoma. Pathol Annu 1981;16:1123-1130.

Holland R, Veling SHJ, Mravunac M et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985;56:979-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N

Rosen PP, Senie R, Schottenfeld D et al. Noninvasive breast carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1979;189:377-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197903000-00021 [PMid:218506 PMCid:PMC1397090]

Lagios MD, Westdahl PR, Margolin FR et al. Duct carcinoma in situ. Relationship of extent of noninvasive disease to the frequency of occult invasion, multicentricity, lymph node metastases, and short-term treatment failures. Cancer. 1982;50(7):1309-1314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19821001)50:7<1309::AID-CNCR2820500716>3.0.CO;2-#

Hall FM. Mammography in the diagnosis of in situ carcinoma. Radiology. 1988;168:279-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380974 [PMid:3380974]

Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW et al. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer. 1982;49(4):751-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<751::AID-CNCR2820490426>3.0.CO;2-Y

Rosen PP, Braun DW Jr, Kinne DW. The clinical significance of pre-invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1980;46(4):919-925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4+<919::AID-CNCR2820461311>3.0.CO;2-Z

Zafrani B, Fourquet A, Vilcoq JR et al. Conservative management of intraductal breast carcinoma with tumorectomy and radiation therapy. Cancer. 1986;57(7):1299-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860401)57:7<1299::AID-CNCR2820570708>3.0.CO;2-B

Fawbles BL, Solin U, Goodman RL. Results of conservative surgery and radiation for intraductal nan-invasive breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 1987;10:110-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198704000-00028

Lagios MD. Human breast precancer: current status. Cancer Surv. 1983;2:383- 402.

Westbrook KC, Gallager HS. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg. 1975;130(6):667-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(75)90417-1

Wang H, Lin J, Lai J et al. Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion. Mol Clin Oncol. 2019;11(3):313-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2019.1891

Théberge I, Vandal N, Guertin MH et al. The mammography screening detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer according to women's characteristics: is it the same? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(2):525-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05095-7 [PMid:30564969]

Van Luijt PA, Heijnsdijk EAM, Fracheboud J et al. The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0705-5 [PMid:27160733 PMCid:PMC4862233]

Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics. 2010;30(5):1183-1198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.305095073 [PMid:20833844]

Weigel S, Heindel W, Heidinger O et al. Digital mammography screening: association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 2014;271(1):38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131498 [PMid:24475843]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.